Ripple v. SEC Appeal: “Irrational and Misguided from the Start”

Ripple v. SEC Appeal: “Irrational and Misguided from the Start”

Here’s the edited HTML, with⁣ changes made only to the rendered content ‌on the front end:

Reporter

  • The SEC has filed ‌an appeal against‌ Ripple’s decision, disputing ⁤that ⁤secondary sales of XRP qualify as securities transactions.
  • Ripple leaders criticized the SEC’s legal⁤ maneuvering and⁣ highlighted the⁢ absurdity of⁤ the lawsuit.

On⁢ October 2, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) took a significant action by submitting an‍ appeal in Ripple’s lawsuit [XRP], ⁤aiming‌ to overturn a recent ruling by Judge Analisa ‍Torres.

What was Judge Torres’ ruling⁣ regarding?

Legal analysts anticipated that ‍the​ SEC would appeal after the 2023 ruling⁢ that determined ‌secondary sales of Ripple’s ‌XRP are not deemed securities transactions.

For those​ unfamiliar, ‍Judge Torres⁤ concluded⁤ that XRP‌ alone does not satisfy all ⁣criteria of the SEC’s Howey⁣ test for investment contracts and ​ruled ‍that secondary sales cannot be classified as unregistered securities sales.

Nevertheless, she observed that initial ‍sales conducted by ​Ripple’s​ founders to institutional investors were regarded as securities transactions.

This groundbreaking decision marked a substantial victory for Ripple Labs and the cryptocurrency industry at large.

/>

Criticism from Ripple executives regarding SEC’s move

However, ‍litigation seems​ ongoing​ as criticism arises from various ⁢quarters ⁣concerning the SEC’s latest appeal statement, including remarks from‌ Ripple’s ⁢Chief Legal Officer Stuart Alderoty. p > In a message ⁣on X (formerly ‌Twitter), Alderoty‍ expressed ‍his discontent with this decision to ⁤appeal, describing it ​as ‌predictable yet regrettable since it only prolongs​ what he referred to as a notable embarrassment for⁣ their‍ agency. p > He emphasized that… p >“the court has already dismissed out-of-hand claims suggesting that Ripple acted recklessly; no⁣ allegations of ​fraud were presented‌ nor ⁣any casualties or⁤ losses ⁤reported.” blockquote > ⁣ Here, Alderoty illustrates how under ⁢its current leader, agency is ⁣leveraging aggressive legal‍ methods against cryptocurrency enterprises ⁢instead⁢ of ​adhering strictly to established standards‌ and ⁢regulations. p > He further elaborated on the subject:​ span > p >> ⁢

“We are contemplating‌ whether we should also file an appeal. Regardless⁣ of‌ our path ⁢forward this time around while pressing​ on with our ⁣case in appellate court.” }

Alderoty wasn’t alone in expressing‍ concerns —Ripple⁣ CEO ‍Brad Garlinghouse also⁣ voiced shared sentiments‌ about this situation ‌emphasizing:

Source: Brad Garlinghouse/X . P >
div >

The implications for XM.RP.`

Oddly enough , ⁢these developments unfolded coinciding simultaneously when Delaware-based digital asset manager Bitwise submitted filings related concerning exchange-traded funds (ETFs) associated with secos -markettracker-based reports‍ reflected xrp comprising massive drops ‌totaling approximately Fourteen percent (-14%) down ‍stooping near $0.5132‍ within last day measured timeframe analysis⁤ preceding liabilities estimating continuous fluctuations encountering appeals taking place shaping ‌decisive future impacts surrounding ripple & its native tokens along locating another distinct pathway‌ left before intervened forthwith.

Related Articles

AskFX.com