Vitalik Buterin Proposes a New Way to Decentralize Ethereum Staking

Vitalik Buterin Proposes a New Way to Decentralize Ethereum Staking

Ethereum staking is facing a ⁣centralization problem – ⁣but the network’s co-founder, Vitalik Buterin, proposed a new ​way to solve the problem on ⁣Tuesday.

In a blog post, Buterin proposed changing the ⁣penalty system for Ethereum⁤ validators by ‍increasing the costs of Colombian misconduct.

**Penalizing ⁤centralized Ethereum staking**

In particular, the method would ‌impose ⁣high ⁢penalties on validators​ who misbehave, even accidentally,‌ if a large portion ⁢of the separately staked ETH⁢ misbehaves⁤ at the same time.

“The theory is ⁢that if you are a single large player, any mistakes you make are more likely to propagate across all the ⁢“identities”⁣ you control, even if you split your coins across many nominally separate accounts,” ‌he wrote.

In ‍September 2022, Ethereum switched to a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism, allowing ‌users to earn a return‌ on their ETH by locking their coins within the ‌protocol. Additionally, control is over block validation and transaction⁤ processing in the hands of those⁢ who hold the most ETH.

This ‌includes⁣ centralized​ exchanges and staking providers such as Lido,​ Coinbase ⁣and Binance, which offer services where smaller investors’ ETH is pooled to be ⁣invested in. ‍Even asset managers like Fidelity are trying to use some of users’ assets for staking purposes.

This has raised concerns in the community about ‌possible collusion between major ⁤Ethereum validators to​ launch a hostile takeover of the network – especially if the government forces them to do so. JPMorgan,‌ for example, noted in October that the Merge and ⁣Shanghai upgrades have resulted in greater centralization ⁢of Ethereum.

**Buterin’s war on large Ethereum validators**

While ‍large Ethereum validators already face​ larger “slashing” penalties – explicit cuts⁢ to a validator’s stake – ⁤compared to smaller stakeholders, Vitalik said that penalties related to Such an unusual ⁢event is not enough​ to move the needle on centralization.

“This⁤ paper proposes to extend a similar type of anti-correlation incentive to ⁤more ‘mundane’ errors, such as failing to⁤ certify, which almost all auditors make at least occasionally,” he explained.

In theory, such a system could ⁣create economic‌ disincentives against centralized operations ⁤and help ⁢reduce economies of scale in the industry.

Last week, Buterin also proposed a “rainbow staking system” that would create new classes of Ethereum staking participants based on their goals.

The system would reduce the⁣ economic and technical burden of independent staking requiring⁤ “everything from everyone,” which has led ETH investors to invest through centralized services⁤ instead.

“We are very ‌dependent on ‌‘social pressure + virtue,’” he said of centralized staking providers earlier this month. “If it is‍ unavoidable,‍ we should be clearer ​about whether we rely on incentives or ⁤on social pressure + virtue, rather than relying excessively on the latter.”

Related Articles

AskFX.com